In the video she posted on the corporate’s inside web site, she accused her boss, recognized in media stories by his surname, Wang, of attacking her in a resort within the metropolis of Jinan after a drunken night with an organization shopper, whom she additionally accused of sexual assault. She mentioned that she had reported the assault to the corporate however nobody acted, prompting her to go public.
Prosecutors in Jinan investigated her accusation however introduced in September that they’d not file fees in opposition to Mr. Wang as a result of his conduct didn’t represent a criminal offense. The different man, who has been recognized in police statements by his final identify, Zhang, remains to be reported to be beneath investigation for his position within the occasions that night time.
The choice to not prosecute Mr. Wang introduced extra consideration to the case. Its notoriety was fueled by Alibaba’s prominence and, maybe, by the federal government marketing campaign in opposition to it and its founder, Mr. Ma.
When Ms. Zhou’s accusation went public, Alibaba mentioned the corporate had “a zero-tolerance policy against sexual misconduct” and vowed it could write an express coverage in opposition to sexual harassment and create a devoted channel for workers to report incidents of misconduct.
Now, in keeping with her dismissal letter, the corporate, too, faces authorized penalties. It didn’t specify a case, however Mr. Wang’s spouse has mentioned publicly that she supposed to sue over his dismissal.
The letter recommended that the corporate had sought Ms. Zhou’s cooperation, providing to cowl the price of lawyer charges and psychological session. It mentioned that she had not responded. Nor did she reply to what seemed to be an effort to barter her termination.
In the tip, nevertheless, the corporate cited her unique accusation as grounds for dismissal, noting an article within the firm’s code of conduct: “Publishing or disseminating inappropriate remarks to the outside world, or deliberately fabricating or disseminating fictitious facts, or disseminating unconfirmed information, causing bad influence.”
Claire Fu contributed analysis.